🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing intently to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a increasing group of countries are considering similar bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that smartphones and networks are "stealing our children's innocence". The policy could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to pass a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding motion calling for a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a good starting point," stated one European lawmaker driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Last year, support gathered behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. However, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Charities have raised concerns. One foundation established by the family of a girl who took her own life after viewing disturbing online content contends that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for minors," commented a leading peer.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, action is primarily occurring at the local level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional access needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills requiring parental consent for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain politicians to mimic the Australian example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from the West, further nations are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, world bodies take a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in safety.

Even as this international debate evolves, the policies of this nation and others indicate that governments globally are less and less content to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.